A New Starting Point for the Analysis of Uncertainty

See  Peter Denning’s Interview* of the Author

Part I  – 8/24/2016:     ACM Ubiquity website
Part II – 8/31/2016:     ACM Ubiquity website
4,000+  downloads

follow link https://scottsdaleartschool.org/checker/ib-extended-essay-conclusion/33/ writing numbers in an essay go to link generic viagra cheapest uk https://thembl.org/masters/undergraduate-thesis-for-chemical-engineering/60/ junk food essay in hindi algebra 2 math homework help importing cialis in australia go to link steps to writing a research paper elementary https://samponline.org/blacklives/essays-application-graduate-school/27/ a trip to remember essay scholarships awc pharmacy reviews exemple de dissertation littraire sur le roman go https://explorationproject.org/annotated/writing-good-introduction-essay/80/ follow url go site descriptive essay description person essays about government control enter site nosql research paper boukistan viagra generic bestrahlung hirntumor nebenwirkungen viagra polemic essay structure essay about time capsule tips for being on accutane americas constitutional freedoms essay typer get link enter example talk essay  

Stochastic models are used in many branches of science and engineering to analyze behavior that appears to be driven by random forces.  The mathematics behind these models can be forbiddingly complex.  Rethinking Randomness presents a surprisingly simple alternative for characterizing and analyzing such behavior – using little more than high school algebra and intuitive “back of the envelope” reasoning,

The alternative approach was motivated by a problem the author first encountered half a century ago:

Why do some probabilistic models work well in practice

even though the systems being modeled fail to satisfy the assumptions that these models require?

The solution to this puzzle starts with a new method for characterizing randomness – based on patterns and relationships that become visible when behavior is observed over intervals of time.   In contrast,  conventional stochastic analyses  begin with the assumption that random behavior is generated by sampling from underlying probability distributions (as in Monte Carlo simulations).   In Rethinking Randomness, standard assumptions about the way randomness is generated are replaced by alternative assumptions about what randomness looks like.

Despite the difference in starting points, the mathematical solutions derived in each case are remarkably similar. This opens the door to an entirely new understanding of when traditional stochastic models will – or will not – work well in real world applications where probabilities are routinely interpreted as proportions (e.g., the proportion of time that a system is in a particular state).

This website provides an extensive set of excerpts from the text of Rethinking Randomness, along with supporting material that was developed following the publication of this book.
.
.
…………………..
*Peter J. Denning is Editor-in-Chief of Ubiquity and a past President of ACM (Association for Computing Machinery)